Refurbishing Indiranagar, Bengaluru: A Metro Node-To-Residential Interior Framework for Walkability and the 20-Minute Neighbourhood  

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68104/ijasit.v1.i4.69

Keywords:

sustainable, integrated strategy, commercial spine, transit oriented, mobility, accessibility

Abstract

The sustainability of urban neighborhoods is influenced not only by the distance to key destinations but also by their accessibility via safe, continuous and comfortable routes. The present paper sets out an accessible planning framework to assess Indiranagar, Bengaluru, as a possible 20-minute neighborhood. Four research objectives are set: (1) understanding the relationships between land use, commercial strips, community amenities, and metro access; (2) developing an approach to quantitatively measuring access by walking and cycling to vital services; (3) identifying street-level obstructions to practical accessibility; and (4) integrating transit, public realm, community amenities, and green-blue-green infrastructure into a Metropolitan Node- to-Residential Interior framework. The manuscript applies a mixed methods approach involving GIS network analyses, land-use and amenity mapping, walkability audits, and – assuming implementation – resident/stakeholder surveys. At this stage, the paper describes the context and analytical framework but does not include results of any network-based accessibility calculations, land use percentages, audit scores, or surveys. Therefore, the main contribution of this paper is the context-specific and testable framework for linking metropolitan-level transit access and neighborhood destinations/public realm quality. Thus, the study does not aim to prove that Indiranagar meets the accessibility criteria of 20 minutes at present. The novelty of the paper consists in developing a testable, neighborhood-specific framework linking metro transportation accessibility with neighborhood destinations, walking, quality of the public realm and ecological infrastructures. The proposed framework serves as an analytical tool for understanding accessibility shortcomings and guiding further actions towards making Indiranagar more accessible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Moreno, Z. Allam, D. Chabaud, C. Gall, and F. Pratlong, “Introducing the ‘15-minute city’: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities,” *Smart Cities*, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 93–111, 2021, doi: 10.3390/smartcities4010006.

D. Banister, “The sustainable mobility paradigm,” *Transport Policy*, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.

R. Cervero and K. Kockelman, “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design,” *Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment*, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 199–219, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.

K. T. Geurs and B. van Wee, “Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions,” *Journal of Transport Geography*, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 127–140, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.

M. Southworth, “Designing the walkable city,” *Journal of Urban Planning and Development*, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 246–257, 2005, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246).

R. Ewing and S. Handy, “Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability,” *Journal of Urban Design*, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 65–84, 2009, doi: 10.1080/13574800802451155.

K. Lynch, *The Image of the City*. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1960.

J. Jacobs, *The Death and Life of Great American Cities*. New York, NY, USA: Random House, 1961.

C. A. Perry, “The neighborhood unit,” in *Regional Survey of New York and Its Environs*, vol. 7, *Neighborhood and Community Planning*. New York, NY, USA: Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs, 1929, pp. 20–140.

Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, *TOD Standard*, Version 3.0. New York, NY, USA: ITDP, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://itdp.org/publication/tod-standard/

J., S. K. Dindaw Kumaraswamy, S. Prakash, R. Chanchani, and A. Deb, *Synergizing Land Value Capture and Transit-Oriented Development: A Study of Bengaluru Metro*. Mumbai, India: World Resources Institute India, 2021, doi: 10.46830/wripn.20.00082.

R. Ewing and R. Cervero, “Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis,” *Journal of the American Planning Association*, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 265–294, 2010, doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766.

B. E. Saelens, J. F. Sallis, and L. D. Frank, “Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures,” *Annals of Behavioral Medicine*, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 80–91, 2003, doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03.

R. A. Handy, B. E. Saelens, and J. F. Sallis, “How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning,” *American Journal of Preventive Medicine*, vol. 23, no. 2, suppl. 1, pp. 64–73, 2002.

A. Páez, D. M. Scott, and C. Morency, “Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators,” *Journal of Transport Geography*, vol. 25, pp. 141–153, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016.

M.-P. Kwan, “Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework,” *Geographical Analysis*, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 191–216, 1998.

P. Calthorpe, *The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream*. New York, NY, USA: Princeton Architectural Press, 1993.

J. Gehl, *Cities for People*. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2010.

M. Carmona, T. Heath, T. Oc, and S. Tiesdell, *Public Places—Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design*, 2nd ed. Oxford, U.K.: Architectural Press, 2010.

E. Talen, “Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism,” *Urban Studies*, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1361–1379, 1999.

J. Montgomery, “Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design,” *Journal of Urban Design*, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93–116, 1998, doi: 10.1080/13574809808724418.

K. Tzoulas et al., “Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review,” *Landscape and Urban Planning*, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 167–178, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.

World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, *Urban Green Spaces and Health: A Review of Evidence*. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016.

M. F. Benedict and E. T. McMahon, *Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities*. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2006.

J. Ahern, “Green infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension,” in *Cities of the Future: Towards Integrated Sustainable Water and Landscape Management*, N. V. Novotny and P. Brown, Eds. London, U.K.: IWA Publishing, 2007, pp. 267–283.

P. W. G. Newman and J. R. Kenworthy, *Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence*. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 1999.

United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), *Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Global Report on Human Settlements 2013*. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2013.

Global Designing Cities Initiative and National Association of City Transportation Officials, *Global Street Design Guide*. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2016.

National Association of City Transportation Officials, *Urban Street Design Guide*. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2013.

Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, *National Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Policy*. New Delhi, India: Government of India, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05

How to Cite

Hegde, Ramya, and Jyothi Gupta. 2026. “Refurbishing Indiranagar, Bengaluru: A Metro Node-To-Residential Interior Framework for Walkability and the 20-Minute Neighbourhood  ”. International Journal of Applied Smart Interdisciplinary Technologies (IJASIT) 1 (4): 71-83. https://doi.org/10.68104/ijasit.v1.i4.69.

Similar Articles

11-14 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.